ISRAELI FRONTLINE is non-profit.
This weblog is rewarded for each click, so please visit our advertisers to see what they are offering.
All opinions expressed on this weblog are those of the author, with the exception of opinions expressed in links that appear on this site and with the exception of comments written by viewers whose opinions may not necessarily reflect the author's. All original material is copyrighted and property of the author, and is not to be used without permission, unless it is attributed to this weblog (with a hyperlink to http://israeli-frontline.com/, or to the particular article shown in this weblog). All emails and messages containing public news and information are presumed to be for publication on this site, unless otherwise specified. I reserve the right to delete comments that I find to be offensive in nature, inappropriate or irrelevant to the content of this weblog. Michelle Cohen, Creator of ISRAELI FRONTLINE-----------------------------------------------© 2010 - 2013 ISRAELI FRONTLINE - All Rights Reserved.
Today's Top Headlines, Videos, Analysis and Opinion / / HOME PAGE

Sunday, October 2, 2011

Knesset Attorney: ‘Nakba Law’ is Constitutional

I think funding (welfare) for the Neturei Karta ought to be cut immediately, since it is their opinion that Israel must not exist.


- Michelle
----------------------------------------------


Knesset’s legal adviser declares the ‘Nakba law’ cutting funding for groups mourning over Israel’s creation to be constitutional.



The “Nakba Law” does not contradict Israel’s Basic Laws, Knesset legal adviser Attorney Eyal Yinon has ruled.


The law states that the Finance Minister may cut government funding for organizations if they make statements or engage in activities rejecting Israel’s existence as a Jewish and democratic state, or if they mark Independence Day as a day of mourning. It was proposed primarily in order to prevent state funding for Arab groups that consider Israel’s creation a disaster, or “nakba.”


Multiple groups and individuals have filed suit to the Supreme Court over the law. Among them are the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), Adalah, and Professor Oren Yiftahel.


The law does not affect the right to free speech at all, Yinon said. No statements or expressions are forbidden by the law; rather, it simply prevents state funding for certain forms of expression.


The state has a right to set priorities and to avoid funding activities that counteract the “core values it strives for,” he stated.


In addition, Yinon and his assistant stated, the law ensures that the process of reducing or cutting funding to groups that mourn Israel’s creation will be done with proper oversight, and only after consultation with relevant professional bodies – thus ensuring that it will not be used to strip groups of their funding without cause.


Yinon’s opinion will be used as the state’s response to the Supreme Court appeals against the law.