ISRAELI FRONTLINE is non-profit.
This weblog is rewarded for each click, so please visit our advertisers to see what they are offering.
All opinions expressed on this weblog are those of the author, with the exception of opinions expressed in links that appear on this site and with the exception of comments written by viewers whose opinions may not necessarily reflect the author's. All original material is copyrighted and property of the author, and is not to be used without permission, unless it is attributed to this weblog (with a hyperlink to http://israeli-frontline.com/, or to the particular article shown in this weblog). All emails and messages containing public news and information are presumed to be for publication on this site, unless otherwise specified. I reserve the right to delete comments that I find to be offensive in nature, inappropriate or irrelevant to the content of this weblog. Michelle Cohen, Creator of ISRAELI FRONTLINE-----------------------------------------------© 2010 - 2013 ISRAELI FRONTLINE - All Rights Reserved.
Today's Top Headlines, Videos, Analysis and Opinion / / HOME PAGE

Friday, September 16, 2011

UN’s Palestinian Statehood Decision Will be an Empty Vessel

By Alan Baker



The Palestinian plan to declare statehood unilaterally at the U.N. is only a public relations exercise. If the outcome of the vote in the General Assembly is successful, as expected, it will benefit the Palestinians only within the confines of the U.N.


Everyone knows that a Palestinian state will not arise a day after the vote, even if the General Assembly passes it. Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas will be cheered and declared a hero as he leaves the podium. But he will not continue as Palestinian Authority president and the person who replaces him will be forced to return to the negotiating table.


The U.N. decision will also not determine the borders between Israel and a Palestinian state. A Palestinian will wake up the next morning, try to travel to Jerusalem, and will not be allowed to enter the city. He will become frustrated, and this will lead to violence. Hamas will take advantage of the situation and use it to incite Palestinians against Fatah. Hamas is not in favor of Abbas making his statehood bid at the U.N., because, in their eyes, this translates to recognition of Israel.


As for Israeli politicians, they panicked and coined the phrase “political tsunami,” but apparently this was only for internal political purposes. The decision at the U.N. must be viewed in perspective. The decision will carry the same weight as the 25 other decisions made against Israel in the General Assembly each year, decisions that lead nowhere.


Assuming that the Americans will not be able to convince the Palestinians to climb down from their tree, the outcome will be an upgrade of the Palestinians' status at the U.N. from “observer” to “non-member state” (like the Vatican). This is just another attempt by the Palestinians to upgrade their status in U.N. organizations such as UNESCO and the World Health Organization.


The next step in their plan will most likely involve turning to the International Court of Justice in The Hague. Palestinians will try to demand membership in the International Court as a state so that they will be able to file lawsuits against Israel, as only member states can do this. However, it is questionable whether the International Court would agree to grant the Palestinians the status of a state, solely on the basis of a non-binding resolution by the U.N. General Assembly.


Alan Baker was Israel's ambassador to Canada and the Israeli Foreign Ministry's Legal Advisor. He is currently the Director of the Institute for Contemporary Affairs at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs.